本版推荐：

fenglingcao
 
等　级：版主

      头　衔：话题主持人
        积　分：18561分

        专家分：303分

看我其他帖子
看我的日志

        看我该帖回复

主题：【每日互动话题】捐款，是爱心自觉，还是道德要挟？（第329期）

收藏本贴 | 好友分享 | 推广拿分

点击:26185 | 回复:187 | 标签:

作者悬赏：

80积分 剩余：

0积分 问题状况：

捐款，是爱心自觉，还是道德要挟
whip-round: consciousness of warm-hearted or shame of morality?

5.12汶川7.8级大地震，成千上万人死亡，海内外各界纷纷捐款捐物、支援震区抗震救灾。根据初步统计，截至5月13日18：00，
社会各界针对地震捐赠款物共计2.21亿元。企业捐赠超过6亿元，尚未纳入统计。

正面观点:爱心无“大小”之分

捐款，是爱心自觉，不是道德要挟；捐款倡议，是爱心的呼唤，不是道德勒索。无论是社会以及每一位公民的良心良知，还是
社会责任的使然，以捐款捐物的形式表达爱心，以一颗赤诚的爱心支援震区抗震救灾，就是爱心行动，就是全国人民万众一心
抗震救灾的体现。赈灾捐款，是同胞情、爱国情；是道义，是责任。

反面观点:捐款是道德要挟

但是，我们也听到或看到，网友中有人对赈灾捐款金额多少的争议，甚至以捐款的多少来“倒推”其收入的大小。捐款金额有
多少之别，但爱心无“大小”之分。我们不能简单地以捐款的多少来评判爱心的大小，不同的收入群体，量力而行自发捐款
，那怕是一分钱的捐款，也是一份爱心。我们不能从舆论上“要挟”或“施压”高收入群体必须捐出多少钱，也不宜用金钱天
平来秤爱心。如果是迫于某些压力而捐款，其爱心就会折扣。

【每日互动话题】奖励规则：

1、沙发奖：1名，奖励沙龙积分5分；　　

2、优秀奖：5名，奖励沙龙积分15分　　

3、互动话题每天早上9：30准时发出，“沙发奖”获得者必须是用英语或者双语来回答的“沙发用户”， “优秀奖”由楼主每天从回帖词友中选出5名优秀者。

【每日互动话题】回帖要求：　　

1、使用中英双语来回答，或者单纯用英语回答　　（实在想不起来英文怎么说的同志，可以只写中文求助高手来帮助。。。）　　

2、至少写个一个完整的句子，当然——多多益善啦　　

3、如果某个英语词组不会写，到爱词霸短句频道去查找，70万个例句等你用：dj.iciba.com

4、“每日互动话题”每周一到周五推出，周六周日以及所有节假日（包括春节啦）停发

最后由 fenglingcao 于 2008-05-15 09:38:33编辑

29
来顶一下

187
快速回复

复制地址

祝iciba的词友们天天都快乐。。。

楼主 Date: 2008-05-15 09:30:49

crystalblue1900

看我其他帖子
看我的日志

		看我该帖回复

帖主对此回复很满意，所以奖励

15 积分给crystalblue1900

I just came back from PEK. I feel a little tired, but I still insist in writing article in this part of bbs.I like this column very much.

We all felt astonished and sad at this terrible earthquake. However, to my excited is that too many people, from all social sectors, have contributed their warm-hearts to disaster areas. But we also see that their are two views emerge into internet. Some people argue that there is no balance of warm-hearted, it's a social responsibily. Every people should be practical and realistic,don't take on more than you can cope with. I agree this viewpoint. Yet there has another view maintian that whip-round is a shame of morality. Some internet users begen to speculate people's income through their contributions. Therefore, some people began to "threaten" or "exert great pressure" to those groups who earn high salary to contribute considerable money. We shouldn't balance warm-heart by contributions. The warm-heart will be at a discount if we just contribute for reducing or avoiding social pressure or public opinion.

All we hear is words, but there is no action. I saw too many internet user apple to contribute money in QQ group. However, how many people do it really? What is more, some people will say a high number when they was asked how much did they contribute which just for saving his face. Don’t forget that contributing is a responsibility and kindness towards suffering compatriots rather than glory or reputation. So if you are still thinking how much should contribute in public space, I suggest you’d better give up the opinion.

Today, one of my friend told me that she intended to adopt an orphan which surprised me. I really admire her courage and kindness. Perhaps those people who contribute too much or just say hollow words have no courage to adopt an orphan. It’s a great difference between one-time investment and investment for life. Therefore, please bring your warm heart but face.
最后由 crystalblue1900 于 2008-05-15 15:58:52编辑

Date: 2008-05-15 09:31:53

参与讨论